Man enters
our Milky Way galaxy alone, small, insignificant with unmet physiological
requirements, anxiety or tension levels and unable to survive on his own. This
essay pertains to the difficulty of being alone and man’s attempts to escape
his isolation. Because of man’s design, such factors as primary drives, needs, activation levels,
reinforcement patterns, expectations and of course anxiety are a few key components in understanding man’s
psychology.
We begin
life alone, dependent, helpless and with anxiety and/or tension activation
levels. If not for another, we are unable to survive. Our basic physiological
drives for food and water are examples. We are unable to meet those
requirements, without a caretaker. Beginning in this fragile state, the infant,
at first, is not able to associate or discriminate exactly how the anxiety or
tension levels are reduced. But with development, he begins to form a cognitive
schematic, and begins to associate and develop expectations for a reduction or
increase in activation levels of comfort or discomfort. The infant clearly
learns that being alone is associated
with anxiety, tension {non pleasure} and non-survival; and being with another
can be associated with less anxiety, tension {pleasure} and survival. Erickson
refers to the stage as developing a sense of trust versus a sense of mistrust.
Consistency and regularity with feeding, diapering, touching, talking to,
affectionate responses etc. are important characteristics for the caretaker.
Caretaker responses can also be irregular, punishing, rejecting, disparaging
attitudes, non-kept promises, inconsistent, rough, loud, withholding,
overprotective etc. So, what we have here is conflictual since the baby does
not nor ever have the full attention or optimum care provided by the caretaker.
As a result, of the many positive and negative reinforcement schedules, a
cognitive expectancy or pattern of likely expectations or outcomes becomes
developed and engrained in the psyche of the youngster. In other words, he
experience positives and negatives within interpersonal interactions.
Regardless, all humans develop and require needs - strategies to escape the
anxiety produced feelings of isolation, helplessness and rejection.
As a result
of man’s isolation vulnerability and anxious state, one manner of escape
becomes the need for affiliation. Affiliation, becomes, for the infant a major building
block for one’s survival. According to Murray, the need for affiliation is
related to enjoyably cooperate or reciprocate with an allied other; please and
win affection of another; and to remain loyal to a friend. With separation from
the other, the results include the activation of anxiety and tension levels. Of
course other psychological needs, and strategy behaviors or defenses are established
to combat the requirement for survival too.
Within this
context, if the interpersonal interactions become dysfunctional, the individual
learns to withdraw, isolate and be unavailable with others resulting in a
neurotic adjustment to life; or he learns to be aggressive, sadomasochistic,
dominant, exploitative, passive and narcissistic in his establishment for power
and prestige with others along with control and possessiveness in his interpersonal
interactions. On the other hand, if the interpersonal interactions tend to
become pleasurable with anxiety or tension reduction activation levels, the
individual learns to experience affection, caring, respect, admiration,
nurturance, and support in its interactions with another. Of course, there’s
various depth and degrees of expression of these three general behavioral
orientations. Obviously there’s no pure form or expression of these three
orientations. However, it appears that the orientation to inflict pain on
others predominates man’s behavior as evidenced by wars, murder rates,
incarceration statistics, criminal justice violations, divorce and social media
dialogue. The loving and withdrawing orientations behavior follow in frequency
and kind. Also entering the equation is
the positive and/or negative reinforcement behavior of the caretaker or
caretakers as well as the many interpersonal life positive and/or negative
reinforcement experiences or history that follows. Regardless of one’s experience
of negative outcomes, there’s still a push toward another encounter with
another with the hope and illusion and expectation for a different outcome.
Ones thinking process and behavior can also be considered an escape from
loneliness or potential loneliness.
Denying or distorting, the reality of
insignificance, powerlessness, and loneliness prevails. It should be apparent
that each individual brings to every interaction or union, an unconscious fear,
anxiety or tension of being alone and the imperative need for attachment with another
in the quest for survival as evidenced man’s active and/or passive behavior.
That unconscious quest for survival is built-in based on our design by the underlying
anxiety or tension component that has been exacerbated by the need structure of
the individual. Another escape myth is that only “love” or “sex” or attachment to
another can resolve this unconscious dilemma or fear. Other escape illusions,
compensations and strategies to combat isolation include marriage, children,
God, religion, politics, pets and other identifications. Additional escapisms
to combat isolation include but not limited to are seeking drugs, using alcohol
and food to reduce the anxiety activation levels. In essence, the solitude of
life, or man’s nature, is an irreducible dimension of human life regardless of
the many defenses, illusions and behaviors employed.
PS
A few other
psychological needs generated by anxiety, insecurity and helplessness include
but are not limited to sex, abasement,
personal achievement, nurturance, prestige, admiration etc. These additional
need factors paint a more complete picture of the nature of Homo sapiens.