This essay incorporates five articles pertaining to
discrimination between people. The references were found in the New York Times:
October 8, 2017 “It’s Not Easy to Prove Racism. This Study Does;” January 3,
2019 “An Ancient and Abiding Hatred;” April 28, 2019 “Prejudice Is Blind;”
“December 8, 2019 “Science Class Defies Racism with Genetics;” and December 29,
2019 “Outsiders Influence.”
There were
roughly 20,000 emails sent to local government employees in nearly every county
in our country. These emails were identical except that half came from either
De Shawn Jackson or Tyrone Washington-group 1. The other half of the emails
came from either Greg Walsh or Jake Mueller-group 2. According to the
researchers, the emails sent to each local officeholder were determined by
chance. Were there differences between the two groups? If so, which group of
emails were more likely to be answered? If you guessed that group 1 were 13%
more likely to go unanswered you were correct.
In a second
experiment, the same 20,000 emails were sent to the same recipients. The
researchers added real estate agent to the names. Did adding real estate agent
change the reply pattern between the two groups? In counties that had a greater
proportion of whites, group 2 emails were more likely to be returned. The authors
concluded that in local government offices, the recipients were less responsive
to those with African-American names compared to white sounding names.
Another researcher
found that people’s brains were more active when they were viewing faces from someone
with their own physical likeness. In another study, Police officers were asked
to look at a computer screen. They were
either exposed to crime related words like apprehend and capture -group 1 or
words not related to crime-group 2. The officers then saw two faces
side-by-side one black and one white. The officers who looked at group 1 words
spent more time looking at the blackface compared to the Whiteface. Analyzing
data from the New York Police Department, the researcher found that black men
were more likely than white men to have been stopped for engaging in what’s called
furtive movement-suspicious behavior like fidgeting with something at your
waistline.
In an article
about hatred and prejudice, columnist Bret Stephens, stated “that most Jews
nevertheless can be said to stand for certain ideals and attitudes. A particular
concept of morality. A reverence for law founded on the idea of truth. A
penchant for asking nettlesome questions. Skepticism toward would-be saviors. A
liberal passion for freedom.” He went on to say that “anti-Semites tend to have
the opposite set of views for reasons that may be repugnant but are perfectly
rational. The fundamental truth about anti-Semitism isn’t that it’s necessarily
crazy. It’s that it’s inevitably brutish.” Merriam-Webster defines brutish
“showing little intelligence or sensibility.”
These
articles, although not exhaustive on the subject of discrimination, illustrate
biases and prejudices .In an attempt to add knowledge about Homo sapiens,
research and training curriculum for secondary biology teachers had been initiated
in our country. This program will measure attitudes of students before the
course and after course completion. The focus, for the first time, pertain to
the science of genetics explaining the similarities and differences between
people. Because of the sensitivity of
the subject matter, not all school districts wanted to take part in the curriculum
program.
This
curriculum attempts to counter such attitudes and beliefs as “members of one
racial group are more ambitious than members of another racial group because of
genetics; genetics are causes of racial inequality; genes cause racial groups
to have distinct skills, and abilities.” It’s clear that racial categories –census
have been used to justify and discriminate governmental policies in our country.
Can this curriculum-program change not only discriminatory thinking but
behavior?
A few facts:
1. Genes are the basic units of heredity and are located on chromosomes 2.
Chromosomes consist of threadlike strands of DNA molecules in the genes consistent
of small segments of DNA. 3. Collectively, genes may number around 25,000 and
are referred to as a human genome. 4. Psychological traits likely depend on
multiple genes with each one accounting for just a small part of the variance
among people 5. A few innate human characteristics: infant reflexes, interest
in novelty, desire to explore and manipulate objects, impulse to play and fool
around and basic cognitive skills 6. Some diseases like Huntington’s are caused
by a single gene. Genes and many
environmental factors influence traits.
Our Census
Bureau defines race [a social construct-not based on biology of genetics as a
person’s self-identification with one or more social groups] as European,
African, Asian, Oceana and Natural American. This census classification is
usually based on physical features like skin color, height, color of eyes and
hair. There is no evidence that these groups have distinctly unifying genetic
identities .There are areas of ample variation within these categories. We also
share 99.9 percent of our DNA with each other. And, our DNA provides clues as
to our ancestry and our human diversity from geographical areas. Don’t forget
that mental and physical health diagnosis like depression, anxiety,
schizophrenia etc. do not discriminate census bureau differences. Psychology;
personality theory; learning theory; motivational theory etc. employ scientific
principles and do not divide people into arbitrary social construct groups.
For example,
there have been much discussion about intellectual IQ differences between
blacks and whites. Current thinking is that research on intelligence do not
suggest that differences are permanent among cultural, ethnic or national
groups; are genetically determined; or signs of a group’s innate superiority. Current
research suggests that we should make sure all children grow up with the best
possible environmental circumstances. The
following are influences that reduce mental ability: 1. Prenatal care 2.
Malnutrition 3. Exposure to toxins 4. Stressful family circumstances. Furthermore,
genes influence our experiences and that our experiences affect our genes as
result of stress, emotions, hormonal etc. In other words, heredity and
environment interact to produce psychological traits and abilities.
Our brains
program us for survival. As young as six months of age, the newborn can
experience stranger anxiety. This means that a baby is likely to cry when
exposed to an unfamiliar person or face. Therefore, words, perception and
emotional responses occur very early in life. Other senses, like hearing, taste
and touch are also clues for survival. Furthermore, psychologically competition
in a capitalistic society increases the capacity for getting ahead; aggression;
hostility; dominance etc. between and among others. Coming in second place is
not rewarded. Being the best is rewarded and valued.
Just think
of various words, titles, names, descriptions, and concepts that have an
emotional component without any apparent or current danger to oneself. These words,
psychologically are discriminatory and are associated with hatred, dislike,
bad, aberrant and abusive behavior: 1. Liberal-Conservative 2.
Democrat-Republican 3. Socialism 4. Communism 5. White- Black- Brown-Yellow 6.
Asian-Iranian 7. Protestant-Catholic-Jew-Muslim 8. LG BT-Abortion-White
Nationalist 9. Homeless -Welfare 10. Immigrant- Gun Control- Climate Change 11.
Einstein, Freud, Marx, Mendelssohn, Mahler, Bernhardt, Kafka, Obama and Trump
to name a few.
Yes, our
brains program us for survival and we are easily mislead. Our government
effectively uses economic and political propaganda- race to discriminate,
dislike, hate, like or to love another. Unfortunately, our interpersonal
history centers on competition, aggression, power, dominance, Irrationality,
impulsivity, ignorance, lies, misinformation, propaganda etc. Man against man includes
our government. Our Republic employs a social construct of race which is
discriminatory, nonobjective and nonscientific. This tool obviously gets in the
way of humanism and brotherhood. Sorry Jefferson, the myth “that all men are
created equal” is just a myth. Our Republic would be better served “to have all
men treated equally” and to eliminate the word “race.”