I have been contemplating
lately of what it would be like to be living as a hunter or gather or a
Neanderthal. I’ve mentioned that to my friend Paul and he joked and gave a
clever response. We both laughed. Have you ever wondered about living in those times? An article in the December 6, 2020 edition of
The New York Times sparked my interest. This brief disquisition pertains to our
ancient cousins.
Neanderthals
inhabited this earth roughly 350,000 years ago. Approximately 40,000 years ago
they vanished when we Sapiens arrived on the scene. There are many
anthropological theories as to the demise of our ancient cousins: 1. Did we
kill them off or have a hand in their demise? 2. Did they assimilate into our
population? 3. Were they on the brink of extinction? 4. Were climatic condition
so unfavorable? 5. Were they inferior-their head size is equal to ours; they
were physically fit and they had dexterous hands?
First, let’s
take a look at some facts pertaining to our Sapiens accomplishments: 1.We are
living in the worst pandemic facing our country 2. We have record unemployment
and economic hardship statistics 3. Our elected congressional government has a sadistic
way of providing monetary assistance 4. Our current president is threatening a
non-peaceful transition of power 5. We are facing a massive foreign government cyber-attack
from Russia 6. We have record opioid, suicide and alcohol-related deaths 7. We
have polluted our oceans, rivers, and streams and ravished our earth, animal
and marine inhabitants 8. Our Doomsday Clock moves closer to midnight 9.
Climate change with its fires, hurricanes, melting glaciers etc. threaten all
mankind 10. We have another month or so of a paranoid, narcissistic,
sociopathic man as the leader of the most powerful country in the world 11. Some
have presented incorrect and misleading information, just look at the pictures of
Neanderthals, and you’ll know what I mean.
On the other
hand, let’s take a look at what we know about our cousins. Yes, they were
driven by aggressive and sexual drives. These drives were necessary and
appropriate for their survival. They were hunters and gatherers. They lived in
small groups called bands. With their physiological capacity and with their
endurance and small numbers, they could, with mutual cooperation and expertise,
track and run down their prey. I know that’s true because I ran while Linda
road her horse in a limited distance [25 miles] Camp Far West endurance ride.
We met at the last veterinarian check and finished together in front of a
number of other participants.
Females, the
matriarchs, for the most part were the respected, and very important central
figures. They gathered seeds, roots, fruits, nuts, berries etc.; provided
warmth, comfort, sexual gratification and procreation was extremely important for
their survival. They were the givers, trained, educated and took care of the
young as well. With the likely absence of possession, jealousy might’ve been
minimal. We know the concept of sin didn’t exist and more than likely sex was
mutual, consensual and known for its benefit for the entire band. The matriarchs
were good models and played a dominant role in their culture. There was
equality between the sexes, in spite of the fact that we sapiens picture them
erroneously dragging women by the hair to a cave.
It’s been estimated that our cousins spent
roughly 25% of their time finding and procuring food which meant they had
plenty of time for sex and other activities. Because they were food gatherers,
the land provided a good vegetarian diet. Perhaps, their attitude was if we do
not eat today, we will eat tomorrow. Fasting for a day is in fact one health
strategy for sapiens.
Our cousins
regarded and respected nature. They were humanistic and kindred in their
beliefs. Nature, the berries, the animals, the fish etc. were for all and not
just for the few or powerful. They were not selfish but generous, altruistic
and would share their bounty with others. There was no private property, no one
owned nature, the land or its resources. It was a collective with a socialistic
or Kibbutz attitude and practice. They were not exploitive and did not enslave
each other. They had no need for a ruler nor did they disagree about who was
the best god. Further, because of their social structure, there was an absence
of envy, and exploitation as well no psychological need for possession, power,
prestige, greed to compensate for insecurity. If exhibited the individual might
be excluded from the band.
They were intelligent and their brains were
roughly the same size as ours. They lived in all climates and cleverly made
body coverings or “clothes” depending upon the necessity. They made workable tools
and figured out by that by mixing tree resin and bee wax they could produce and
make an adhesive additive to connect stone with wooden handles. They were
artists and drew on caves. Their pictures and depictions of people, animals, and
their hunts described their way of life.
There is a
belief that our ancient cousins did not kill or murder one another per 300
findings of bone, DNA, gene and grave excavations. They were not concerned
about skin color, political or religious beliefs. They had no conspiracy ideas.
No weapons have been found nor have excavations
revealed death by warfare or massacre. Of course, more data is needed and
hopefully forthcoming for more definitive facts.
We know they were skilled hunters however
there was no need for a dominance-submissive culture. They respected the
surplus in nature and even the killing of wild life for food. They killed to
survive and not for displaying trophies. There was no apparent economic stimulus or
advantage for a full scale war based on the following: 1.The had a delicate balance
of the birth to death ratio 2. The bands were poor as far as material goods and
had little of value 3. Conquering slaves would present a problem and require
providing more food 4. Psychologically they were generous, cooperative and believed
in reciprocity and exhibited more “feminine” dominated attributes. 5. Likely
they did not have a revenge motive either 6. There was an absence of male
dominated chiefs, priests, medicine man, kings, emperors, dictators, or president
hierarchies. The matriarchs were supreme 7. Self-centeredness, narcissism,
physical aggression and lying behavior was not tolerated by the band.
Within the last
9,000 to 40,000 years of sapiens, we had an urban revolution with the following:
1. We have developed agriculture for wheat and barley, herding and taming
husbandry 2. We possess dirt, technology, sand, water, space etc. so we can
defend against 3. We have socio class systems of the privileged and the laborers,
unequal division of labor and wealth, and disequilibrium between
people-ruler-worker 4. We have boundaries, cities, town’s countries etc. 5. We innovated war, created kings or God’s
representatives to be sadistic and cruel to defend and possess all types of
things like flags, capitalism, religion, dirt etc. 6. We do not welcome
intruders or immigrants 7. We found ways
to abuse and exploit man economically 8. We have economic and political wars in
order to secure women, slaves, raw materials, and land in order to maintain a
ruling dynasty or class 9.We are the land of the rich and poor 10. Democracy is
permitted primarily for white skinned sapiens 11. We have unlimited racism 12.
We have developed patriarchal rule in order to control others less desirable
13. With patriarchal power we have built things and have controlled the masses
by fear, and irrational authority 14. We have built things in order to
sadistically destroy, demolish and wipe out and murder all forms of life on
this planet including more recently Dresden and Hiroshima.
Destructiveness
and murder is likely not innate in man
but resulted as a consequence of civilization creation ; private property; development of weaponry;
man exploiting man; idolizing rulers
like Alexander, Genghis Khan, Caesar, Hitler etc. In other words, with
patriarch domination we are failing. Sapiens have about 2%-3% of Neanderthals
DNA. We need more of their genes, or with technology create a more
sophisticated and smarter human with a very different character structure.
Perhaps, more dominant feminine characteristics are the answer as well as the
creation of a more civil civilization. Sapiens intelligence seems adequate but
not man’s emotional intelligence with sadistic destruction; hate; greed;
exploitation and selfishness. Emotionally, male sapiens get into trouble
because of underlying anxiety and insecurities within evolution while creating
a toxic and destructive society.
With that
being said, there is a small glimmer of hope as anthropologists Ruth Benedict,
Margaret Mead and others studied primitive societies. I would reframe primitive
and call them civil. In studying the Zuni Pueblo Indians, the Mountain Arapesh,
the Polar Eskimo and other societies, they found aggression but not significant
amounts of murder and destructiveness toward their own kind.
PS
Gail, a
lover from the past, purchased a large poster of Raquel Welch from her One Million
BC movie. I hung it at the top of our
stairs so I could see it every time I entered my apartment. I am still smiling.