These psychoanalytic
theoreticians all view the importance, significance or role of anxiety during
the human lifespan, especially in understanding neurosis. It’s a precursor and
can be viewed as an underlining dynamic. Academic psychologists such as S. Schachter researched anxiety as an underlying
motive as far as social affiliation was concerned. Karen Horney, Erich Fromm
and Harry Stack Sullivan also incorporated affiliation [Although they used
other terms] within their theories as result of their therapeutic work. They
did not conduct research with college students. There subjects were males and
females, some of which were college-aged.
Let’s see what Schachter
found studying the relationship between anxiety and social affiliation, with
his various psychological experiments. In one experiment, Schachter studied
high anxiety females [they were told they would receive severe painful but not
harmful, electrical shocks] and compared them to low anxiety females [they were
told they had received mild shocks, and the shocks would feel like a tickle and
would be harmless]. All the subjects were told that their physiological
responses would be recorded. Before proceeding, these college females were told
they could either wait alone in a comfortable room which had books and
magazines or together in a classroom with other female students. A
questionnaire was administered and the women gave their preference for either waiting
alone or being together. The scale also assessed the
degree of intensity of their expressed desire to wait alone or together. Prior,
females were also given a choice of remaining for the experiment or leaving.
Some chose not to take part. The difference between the intensity of the desire
of the girls in the two groups to be with the others was significant compared
to waiting alone, and suggested that anxiety leads to affiliative behavior in
college women.
On further research
with college subjects, Schachter found statistically significant evidence that
firstborn tended to affiliate under stress conditions, while later born did
not. Also, fewer firstborn were chronic alcoholics, entered into and stayed
longer in psychotherapy, and fewer become fighter pilot aces compared to later
born. Firstborn nursery school children were found to be more dependent and
firstborn college males were found to be more conforming than later born siblings.
Schachter believed that firstborn individuals had anxiety and pain relief by
people more often and greater than later born children. Likely, because the
mother was perhaps more worried and more sensitive to expressions of anxiety of
her firstborn, compared to her later born children. More than likely, with the
second child, the mother was more casual, relaxed and likely busier than she had
been with her initial child. If this is so, the firstborn children should have
received the more attention from others, especially from the mother than her
anxious later born children.
I. Sarnoff and Phillip
Zimbardo conducted psychological experiments relating fear to affiliation. In
their studies, they found that when under a strong fear of electric shock, that
their male subjects experienced more of a desire to affiliate compared to the others
under low fear conditions. They also found that firstborn and only children
showed more of a wish to affiliate under fear than did later born subjects
[males]. In these studies that Incorporated both male and female college
students, does the clichĂ© “misery loves company” fit?
Wouldn’t you agree that
there is evidence that anxiety - fear can be “easily “induced? This means that we are extremely vulnerable
and sensitive to the spoken word. We
scare easily. We also know that the world of advertising and various
politicians manipulate and are masters and sophisticated at employing the
tactic of fear. These politicians tell us if we do such and such or if we don’t
do such and such , our lives will become disastrous , especially now, as well
as for our children’s future. They expertly pedal fear. For example,
our most recent created government agency [Homeland Security] was supposed to
protect us from whatever. Do you currently feel more or less anxious as a
result of the creation of Homeland Security? We have the greatest military in
the history of the world, all sorts of treaties and multiple weapons of mass
destruction. Also, our police forces are equipped with the latest military gear.
Are we really safer and do we experience less anxiety as a result of all that
spending and weaponry? Do more bullets and more guns help you in reducing your
anxiety? You probably don’t even know the answer to that question. If you had a
bazooka, would that do the trick?
As you know there many
polls taken in this country. In responding to or filling out a survey, and when
asked to rate your concerns, the word concern really refers to anxiety or fear.
A dictionary definition of concern was “Solicitude or anxiety.” If your number
one concern is the economy or employment, then you obviously experience
anxiety, which translates into security, or lack thereof. These polls are
really measuring the anxiety forces in your life.
Since we began early in
life with a significant level of fear or anxiety, some level is always there,
and it doesn’t take much to increase or heightened those symptoms of anxiety.
Generally, focusing on belly breathing and being in the here and now, often
helps in reducing these awful symptoms. Activity, exercise, yoga are also
valuable tools that can be used. If these suggestions don’t work, find a good
therapist since alcohol, drugs and other escapes, are other illusions and don’t
solve the issue.
0 comments:
Post a Comment